<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Differentiable Expected Hypervolume Improvement for Parallel Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.05078/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.05078/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Differentiable Expected Hypervolume Improvement for Parallel Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization — mentioned by mccourt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23793847</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2006.05078:23793847</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:19:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This blog post lists a bunch of gradient-free optimization packages, some genetic and some Bayesian: https://sigopt.com/blog/comparison-bayesian-packages-hyperpa.... Nothing from the mathematical programming community in here, so definitely other options too (depending on what kind of problems you are trying to address). Personally, I like Nevergrad (https://facebookresearch.github.io/nevergrad/) a lot for general purpose optimization problems -- I think it is very well implemented and has a variety of tools available. I also think the documentation is appropriately honest about what is and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.05078/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
