<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evaluation of Similarity-based Explanations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.04528/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.04528/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Evaluation of Similarity-based Explanations — mentioned by andy99</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27862594</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2006.04528:27862594</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2021 00:17:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Related to understanding how ML models are making their decisions is the concept of influence [1] (or broadly, instance based explanations) [2] where the training data that is most influential in a prediction (basically the analogy the model used) is highlighted. See also [3] where I provide a take on using these methods for understanding if you can trust a prediction or not, based on whether the model has an appropriate analogy to work from [1] Understanding black box predictions through influence functions, https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04730 [2] Evaluation of Similarity-based Explanations…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2006.04528/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
