<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Impact of a Major Security Event on an Open Source Project: The Case of OpenSSL · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.14242/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.14242/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Impact of a Major Security Event on an Open Source Project: The Case of OpenSSL — mentioned by fanf2</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23966927</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2005.14242:23966927</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:56:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently saw this paper which describes several ways in which OpenSSL is better than it was: &amp;quot;The impact of Heartbleed on openssl&amp;#x27;s development practices&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14242&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.14242/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>The Impact of a Major Security Event on an Open Source Project: The Case of OpenSSL — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23872019</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2005.14242:23872019</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:07:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;What changed in OpenSSL after heartbleed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;158 points; 64 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.14242/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
