<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Revisiting RowHammer: An Experimental Analysis of Modern DRAM Devices and Mitigation Techniques · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.13121/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.13121/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Revisiting RowHammer: An Experimental Analysis of Modern DRAM Devices and Mitigation Techniques — mentioned by thijsr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39166761</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2005.13121:39166761</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:43:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;RowHammer is not a thing of the past. In fact, modern DRAM chips are significantly more susceptible to RowHammer due to their increased chip density [1]. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.13121&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.13121/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AR</category></item><item><title>Revisiting RowHammer: An Experimental Analysis of Modern DRAM Devices and Mitigation Techniques — mentioned by GregarianChild</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25624353</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2005.13121:25624353</guid><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2021 19:27:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper you cite is from 2014 and the mitigations discussed there have all been circumvented. [1] is from 2020 and a better read for Rowhammer mitigation. [1] J. S. Kim et al, Revisiting RowHammer: An Experimental Analysis of Modern DRAM Devices and Mitigation Techniques https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.13121&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.13121/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AR</category></item></channel></rss>
