<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How to generate random lambda terms? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.08856/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.08856/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How to generate random lambda terms? — mentioned by bmc7505</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41148925</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2005.08856:41148925</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2024 20:11:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Maciej Bendkowski has some related work [1] on generating random lambda terms, but was unable to overcome what he calls the asymptotic sparsity problem: Sampling simply-typed terms seems notoriously more challenging than sampling closed ones. Even rejection sampling, whenever applicable, admits serious limitations due to the imminent asymptotic sparsity problem — asymptotically almost no term, be it either plain or closed, is at the same time (simply) typeable. [...] Asymptotic sparsity of simply-typed λ-terms is an impenetrable barrier to rejection sampling techniques. As the term size tends…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.08856/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
