<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Generalizing The Davenport-Mahler-Mignotte Bound -- The Weighted Case · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.07843/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.07843/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Generalizing The Davenport-Mahler-Mignotte Bound -- The Weighted Case — mentioned by JadeNB</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30060417</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2005.07843:30060417</guid><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:01:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A request: please always link to abstract pages of articles, not directly to PDFs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07843&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.07843/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SC</category></item><item><title>Generalizing The Davenport-Mahler-Mignotte Bound -- The Weighted Case — mentioned by abetusk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30059241</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2005.07843:30059241</guid><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:59:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;So, to state explicitly, given a list of positive integers, a_i, and coefficients, d_i \in {-1,1}, test whether \sum_i d_i sqrt(a_i) &amp;lt;=? 0. Now, construct a polynomial, P(z) = \prod_i (z^2 - a_i), and this gives a (univariate) polynomial so that a Mahler-Mignotte like bound can be used. I guess there&amp;#x27;s different levels of bounds you can use (Mahler, Mahler-Mignotte, Davenporte-Mahler-Mignotte [0]) but they all involve the discriminant, the deg to the deg power (n^n) and maybe some other factors which put it neatly in a polynomial time bit representation. One bound puts it in the 2^{-2s^2}…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2005.07843/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SC</category></item></channel></rss>
