HackerPapers

arXiv:2005.00495q-bio.PE

Inferring the effective fraction of the population infected with Covid-19 from the behaviour of Lombardy, Madrid and London relative to the remainder of Italy, Spain and England

Robert S Thorne

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

I use a very simple deterministic model for the spread of Covid-19 in a large population. Using this to compare the relative decay of the number of deaths per day between different regions in Italy, Spain and England, each applying in principle the same social distancing procedures across the whole country, I obtain an estimate of the total fraction of the population which had already become infected by April 10th. In the most heavily affected regions, Lombardy, Madrid and London, this fraction is higher than expected, i.e. $\approx 0.3$. This result can then be converted to a determination of the infection fatality rate $ifr$, which appears to be $ifr \approx 0.0025-0.005$, and even smaller in London, somewhat lower than usually assumed. Alternatively, the result can also be interpreted as an effectively larger fraction of the population than simple counting would suggest if there is a variation in susceptibility to infection with a variance of up to a value of about 2. The implications are very similar for either interpretation or for a combination of effects.

arXiv comments
19 pages. 6 figures.The updated article considers the possibility of variable susceptibility to infection. The analysis remains unaltered but the interpretation of the results is extended. The overall conclusions are largely unaltered
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
q-bio.PEPopulations and Evolution

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2020 to May 2020. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2020 to May 2020. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Like most questions, the answer will get more complex the closer you look. But we're doing the "science" thing: collecting more data, and narrowing the error bars. Past a point, you know enough that more accuracy won't change your action choices. That's a good enough answer for…

      marojejianView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.