<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.14974/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.14974/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims — mentioned by jruohonen</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43933709</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2004.14974:43933709</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 04:06:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This project was interesting enough to quickly skim through. Regarding the actual verification, they use this dataset: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.14974 To progress in this space, many more datasets would be likely required. The problem with the above dataset also is that it categorizes things into true/false/maybe. Not many things fit into such a coarse categorization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.14974/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23041820</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2004.14974:23041820</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 13:34:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.14974/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
