https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.07213/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25851444urn:hackerpapers:mention:2004.07213:25851444Wed, 20 Jan 2021 20:21:07 GMT<p>Yes; automated approaches amplify bias[0]. Moreover, automated approaches launder bias; in the general population, people view computers and algorithms as &quot;unbiased&quot;, so imagine biased results to be more accurate than humans, because a computer did them. 0: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.07842 2: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07213 also has an overview of our current combative systems.</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.07213/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CYhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22894501urn:hackerpapers:submission:2004.07213:22894501Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:05:18 GMT<p>Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims</p><p></p><p>4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.07213/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CY