Relativistic corrections to the rotation curves of disk galaxies — mentioned by Zamicol

Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:04:37 GMT

It doesn't, and the problems have only become more problematic over time, but it's the least bad hypothesis that's broadly accepted. I suspect a generational succession is required for new paradigms to be contemplated. There are many researchers proposing simpler, novel, and testable solutions that seem to go unnoticed. For example, I'm a fan of Alexandre Deur's work. He has some simple and elegant solutions that I've never seen discussed even though they appear "obvious". For example, from 21 years ago: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.05905 That paper is suggesting that one of the reasons why…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Relativistic corrections to the rotation curves of disk galaxies — mentioned by Zamicol

Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:57:23 GMT

I'd like to see more work done with investigating field self-interaction. This 2020 paper by Alexandre Deur is very interesting. "[W]e find that relativistic corrections to the rotation curves of disk galaxies are significant at large galactic radii." "Relativistic corrections to the rotation curves of disk galaxies" - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.05905.pdf And a blog covering the paper: https://astrobites.org/2020/08/17/the-alternative-to-dark-ma...

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Relativistic corrections to the rotation curves of disk galaxies · HackerPapers discussions

Relativistic corrections to the rotation curves of disk galaxies — mentioned by Zamicol

Relativistic corrections to the rotation curves of disk galaxies — mentioned by Zamicol