Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer · HackerPapers discussions

Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer — mentioned by crispycrafter2

Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:57:05 GMT

The problem with ab-initio methods in this context is the sheer number of non-covalent interactions present in these large proteins. A simple protein would require a hybrid quantum mechanic/molecular mechanics simulation to even approximate the vibrational energy required to validate equilibrium. These proteins are so massive that we often use Daltons [1] as an averaged measure of molecular weight. Conceptually one of the most promising applications of quantum computing is theoretical chemistry, and we are only now starting to make progress in this avenue [2]. I anticipate it would require…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer — mentioned by cinquemb

Thu, 01 Oct 2020 08:31:30 GMT

How does this compare to the Google Sycamore quantum processor? Would be cool if one could use this to do Hartree-Fock how google layed out [0] with the qubits to compute a bunch of binding energies for a matrix of different elements and molecules and use those to find activation coefficients on a classical computer. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04174

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer — HN submission

Tue, 01 Sep 2020 17:04:50 GMT

Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer — mentioned by mxcrossb

Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:15:34 GMT

Arxiv link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04174

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer — HN submission

Tue, 12 May 2020 12:32:07 GMT

Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.