<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Lossless Image Compression through Super-Resolution · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.02872/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.02872/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Lossless Image Compression through Super-Resolution — mentioned by srec-author</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22809039</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2004.02872:22809039</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 00:40:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;First author here. First of all thanks so much for the interest in SReC! It was a pleasant surprise seeing my research on top of Hacker News. Answering a few questions from reading the comments: How is this lossless? The entropy coder is what makes this technique lossless. The neural network predicts a probability distribution over pixels, and the entropy coder can find a near optimal mapping of pixel values to bits based on those probabilities (near optimal according to Shannon’s entropy). On practicality of the method, I don’t expect SReC to replace PNGs anytime soon. The current…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.02872/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.IV</category></item></channel></rss>
