<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fermi surface transformation at the pseudogap critical point of a cuprate superconductor · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.01725/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.01725/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fermi surface transformation at the pseudogap critical point of a cuprate superconductor — mentioned by pdonis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30774780</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2004.01725:30774780</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 03:58:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The Nature link to the paper in the article is paywalled. The arxiv preprint is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.01725 As is unfortunately usual with press releases, this press release is gobbledygook that doesn&amp;#x27;t really give any useful information about what is going on. The word &amp;quot;vanish&amp;quot; in particular is very poorly chosen: it does not appear at all in the actual paper, and of course the actual paper nowhere claims that electrons just vanish (which is physically impossible--the only way to make an electron &amp;quot;vanish&amp;quot; is to annihilate it with a positron, and nothing of that sort is going on…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2004.01725/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.str-el</category></item></channel></rss>
