https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.13879/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42767026urn:hackerpapers:mention:2003.13879:42767026Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:09:22 GMT<p>This reply reads as though it were AI generated. Let&#x27;s bite though, and hope that unhelpful excessively long-winded replies are just your quirk. &gt; This is itself a slippery move. A vague gesture at past misconduct without actually specifying any incidents. If there&#x27;s a clear pattern of documented benchmark manipulation, name it. Which benchmarks? When? What was the evidence? Without specifics, this is just trading one form of handwaving (&quot;everyone does it&quot;) for another (&quot;they did it before&quot;). Ok, provide specifics yourself then. Someone replied and pointed out that they have every incentive…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.13879/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>astro-ph.IM