<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Factorizations for tree amplitudes in the double-cover framework: from gravity to other theories · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.12528/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.12528/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Factorizations for tree amplitudes in the double-cover framework: from gravity to other theories — mentioned by wrycoder</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27097208</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2003.12528:27097208</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2021 16:20:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Charlie Wood is no Natalie Wolchover. The article is depressingly simplistic - it&amp;#x27;s something I&amp;#x27;d expect from Science Alert, not Quanta. I looked for a better entry into the subject and found this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08183 And a longer review article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12528&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.12528/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
