<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Apps Gone Rogue: Maintaining Personal Privacy in an Epidemic · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.08567/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.08567/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Apps Gone Rogue: Maintaining Personal Privacy in an Epidemic — mentioned by saagarjha</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22668387</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2003.08567:22668387</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 20:28:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Summary: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UGY07m8GNrUaj9bGRx07vDMccxT... Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.08567.pdf It seems like the way this preserves privacy is that you only upload your location information once you&amp;#x27;re tested positive, where it is &amp;quot;redacted&amp;quot; (I have very little faith in this) and then sent to everyone else so they can check to see if they were in contact with you. It&amp;#x27;s better than mass surveillance, sure, but I&amp;#x27;m not sure if you can claim that this doesn&amp;#x27;t give up individual privacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.08567/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
