<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recovery of Damaged Information and the Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.07267/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.07267/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Recovery of Damaged Information and the Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators — mentioned by refibrillator</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41288203</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2003.07267:41288203</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:58:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper (2020): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.07267 As a layperson I found the first page to be more succinct and intuitive than the article. &amp;gt; Let Alice have such a processor that implements fast information scrambling during a reversible unitary evolution of many interacting qubits. She applies this evolution to hide an original state of one of her qubits, which we call the central qubit. The other qubits are called the bath. To recover the initial central qubit state, Alice can apply a time-reversed protocol. &amp;gt; Let Bob be an intruder who can measure the state of the central qubit in any basis…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.07267/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Recovery of Damaged Information and the Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators — mentioned by kkylin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24169232</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2003.07267:24169232</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2020 14:44:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like this is the paper: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12... ArXiV: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07267&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.07267/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Recovery of Damaged Information and the Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators — mentioned by jostylr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24168533</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2003.07267:24168533</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:59:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a non-paywalled article: https://ladailypost.com/lanl-simulating-quantum-time-travel-... Here is the preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07267 They are using the linearity to say that the effect is not magnified as it would be classically, but it is in the context of repairing damage done by a measurement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.07267/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
