<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Taylor Expansion Policy Optimization · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.06259/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.06259/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Taylor Expansion Policy Optimization — mentioned by woko</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26141035</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2003.06259:26141035</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:51:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I see your point when it comes to paper publication in general, but I feel that your post is very unwarranted with respect to the original post: DeepMind has recruited top-quality theoretical researchers from public institutions, it is not just experimental work which your average Joe could do with a few guesses. These researchers published a lot of theoretical papers before they were recruited, and they still publish a lot of them now that they are working at DeepMind, but they have more computational hardware to apply their ideas. Here is just one uncurated example of a publication…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.06259/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
