HackerPapers

arXiv:2003.03033cs.LG

What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?

Davis Blalock, Jose Javier Gonzalez Ortiz, Jonathan Frankle, John Guttag

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Neural network pruning---the task of reducing the size of a network by removing parameters---has been the subject of a great deal of work in recent years. We provide a meta-analysis of the literature, including an overview of approaches to pruning and consistent findings in the literature. After aggregating results across 81 papers and pruning hundreds of models in controlled conditions, our clearest finding is that the community suffers from a lack of standardized benchmarks and metrics. This deficiency is substantial enough that it is hard to compare pruning techniques to one another or determine how much progress the field has made over the past three decades. To address this situation, we identify issues with current practices, suggest concrete remedies, and introduce ShrinkBench, an open-source framework to facilitate standardized evaluations of pruning methods. We use ShrinkBench to compare various pruning techniques and show that its comprehensive evaluation can prevent common pitfalls when comparing pruning methods.

arXiv comments
Published in Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems 2020 (MLSys 2020)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2020 to Jul 2020. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.