HackerPapers

arXiv:2003.02154physics.acc-ph

Non-Planar Coil Winding Angle Optimization for Compatibility with Non-Insulated High-Temperature Superconducting Magnets

Carlos Paz-Soldan

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The rapidly emerging technology of high-temperature superconductors (HTS) opens new opportunities for the development of non-planar non-insulated HTS magnets. This type of HTS magnet offers attractive features via its simplicity, robustness, and is well-suited for modest size steady-state applications such as a mid-scale stellarator. In non-planar coil applications the HTS tape may be subject to severe minor-axis bending strain ($ε_{bend}$), torsional strains ($ε_{tor}$) and transverse magnetic field components ($B_\perp$), all of which can limit the magnet operating space. A novel method of winding angle optimization is here presented to overcome these limitations. Essentially, this method: 1) calculates the peak εbend and B\perp for arbitary winding angle along an input coil filamentary trajectory, 2) defines a cost function including both, and then 3) uses tensioned splines to define a winding angle that reduces $ε$tor and optimizes the εbend and $B_\perp$ cost function. As strain limits are present even without $B_\perp$, this optimization is able to provide an assessment of the minimimum buildable size of an arbitrary non-planar non-insulating HTS coil. This optimization finds that for standard 4 mm wide HTS tapes the minimum size coils of the existing HSX, NCSX, and W7-X stellarator geometries are around 0.3 - 0.5 m in radius. For coils larger than this size, permitting a finite (yet tolerable) strain allows reduction of $B_\perp$. This enables a reduction of the HTS tape length required to achieve a given design magnetic field or equivalently an increase in the achievable magnetic field for fixed HTS tape length. The distinct considerations for optimizing a stellarator coilset to further ease compatibility with non-insulated HTS magnets are also discussed.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1017/S0022377820001208
Subjects
physics.acc-phAccelerator Physics physics.plasm-phPlasma Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2020 to Dec 2020.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I hate to bring up a spoiler effect because it has been a toxic sour point between competing MCF designs in the past, but MIT is actively pulling funds away from attractive coil winding techniques that are public and subject to peer review. I’m rather close to this issue because…

      willis936View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.