<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.01690/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.01690/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks — mentioned by orange3xchicken</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29645037</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2003.01690:29645037</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 02:54:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m less familiar with poisoning, but at least for test-time robustness, the current benchmark for image classifiers is AutoAttack [0,1]. It&amp;#x27;s an ensemble of adaptive &amp;amp; parameter-free gradient-based white-box and gradient-free black-box attacks. Submitted academic work is typically considered incomplete without an evaluation on AA (and sometimes deepfool [2]). It&amp;#x27;s good to see that both are included in ART. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01690 [1] https://github.com/fra31/auto-attack [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.04599&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2003.01690/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
