<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Constraints on Primordial Black Holes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.12778/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.12778/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Constraints on Primordial Black Holes — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27329609</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2002.12778:27329609</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2021 00:45:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Or what if Dark Matter was lots of Black Holes? Black holes are indeed[1] a dark matter contender! Just because the best explanation[2] we have right now is cold dark matter (CDM), doesn&amp;#x27;t mean physicists are content. They&amp;#x27;re looking for new ways[3] to probe not just CDM but other dark matter models as well, like primordial black holes[4]. Dark matter is by no means a settled topic. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_hole [2]: http://pirsa.org/20040087/ &amp;quot;Dark Matter: A Cosmological Perspective&amp;quot;, nice colloquium talk giving overview of what we know about dark matter. [3]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.12778/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
