https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.11054/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28251839urn:hackerpapers:submission:2002.11054:28251839Fri, 20 Aug 2021 21:54:19 GMT<p>MLIR: A Compiler Infrastructure for the End of Moore&#x27;s Law</p><p></p><p>2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.11054/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.PLhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22829670urn:hackerpapers:mention:2002.11054:22829670Fri, 10 Apr 2020 03:17:53 GMT<p>I find it fascinating this research and MLIR[1] seem to have been developed independently around the same time. Figure 1 tells the same story in both papers. The authors mention the possibility of representing their concepts in MLIR, which could be really interesting. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.11054.pdf</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.11054/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.PLhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22429107urn:hackerpapers:submission:2002.11054:22429107Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:30:56 GMT<p>MLIR: A Compiler Infrastructure for the End of Moore&#x27;s Law</p><p></p><p>211 points; 68 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.11054/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.PLhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22422550urn:hackerpapers:submission:2002.11054:22422550Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:09:56 GMT<p>MLIR: A Compiler Infrastructure for the End of Moore&#x27;s Law</p><p></p><p>3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.11054/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.PL