<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Betelgeuse Just Isn't That Cool: Effective Temperature Alone Cannot Explain the Recent Dimming of Betelgeuse · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.10463/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.10463/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Betelgeuse Just Isn't That Cool: Effective Temperature Alone Cannot Explain the Recent Dimming of Betelgeuse — mentioned by deeths</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27875272</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2002.10463:27875272</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:34:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m glad that was helpful. I&amp;#x27;m in a similar boat of just being interested in this for fun. I have a little more of the math and physics background for it, but it&amp;#x27;s pretty rusty and I don&amp;#x27;t need it to understand even most of the interesting papers. You probably want to understand three areas in more detail than you&amp;#x27;ll get from the wikipedia links I sent: 1) cosmology (people gave several good recommendations already) 2) wrap your head around the weirdness of quantum physics. I really enjoyed Six Impossible Things by John Gribbin as a good intro to different equivalent ways of conceptualizing…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.10463/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.SR</category></item><item><title>Betelgeuse Just Isn't That Cool: Effective Temperature Alone Cannot Explain the Recent Dimming of Betelgeuse — mentioned by auxbuss</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22432279</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2002.10463:22432279</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:04:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper [0] from a couple of days ago (24 Feb 2020) found that Betelgeuse&amp;#x27;s recent dimming was not caused by a drop in the star&amp;#x27;s surface temperature. &amp;quot;We present optical spectrophotometry of the red supergiant Betelgeuse from 2020 February 15, during its recent unprecedented dimming episode. By comparing this spectrum to stellar atmosphere models for cool supergiants, as well as spectrophotometry of other Milky Way red supergiants, we conclude that Betelgeuse has a current effective temperature of 3600 +/- 25 K. While this is slightly cooler than previous measurements taken prior to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.10463/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.SR</category></item><item><title>Betelgeuse Just Isn't That Cool: Effective Temperature Alone Cannot Explain the Recent Dimming of Betelgeuse — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22431102</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2002.10463:22431102</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:29:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Effective Temperature Alone Cannot Explain the Recent Dimming of Betelgeuse&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.10463/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.SR</category></item></channel></rss>
