<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mapping the Interplanetary Filesystem · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.07747/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.07747/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Mapping the Interplanetary Filesystem — mentioned by momack2</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23524852</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2002.07747:23524852</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:43:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For anyone looking at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.07747.pdf to get an estimate on the actual # of IPFS nodes, note that these tools are trying to crawl the number of nodes acting as &amp;quot;DHT Servers&amp;quot; in the Public IPFS DHT. Nodes behind home firewalls or NATs don&amp;#x27;t become DHT routers because they aren&amp;#x27;t dialable, and other large users intentionally set many of their nodes into a lower-bandwidth client mode. Also, many applications run their own private IPFS networks (like OpenBazaar for instance) and don&amp;#x27;t participate in the Public IPFS DHT, so wouldn&amp;#x27;t be reached through a crawler here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.07747/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NI</category></item></channel></rss>
