<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Top-k Training of GANs: Improving GAN Performance by Throwing Away Bad Samples · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.06224/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.06224/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Top-k Training of GANs: Improving GAN Performance by Throwing Away Bad Samples — mentioned by gwern</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42561803</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2002.06224:42561803</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 21:02:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m also reminded of top-_k_ training/sampling, where you throw away the inconsistent samples: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06224 &amp;quot;Top-k Training of GANs: Improving GAN Performance by Throwing Away Bad Samples&amp;quot;, Sinha et al 2020. Which seems like it would be roughly equivalent to throwing away gradients if they are inconsistent...?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.06224/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
