arXiv:2002.00521physics.optics
Maximal single-frequency electromagnetic response
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Modern nanophotonic and meta-optical devices utilize a tremendous number of structural degrees of freedom to enhance light--matter interactions. A fundamental question is how large such enhancements can be. We develop an analytical framework to derive upper bounds to single-frequency electromagnetic response, across near- and far-field regimes, for any materials, naturally incorporating the tandem effects of material- and radiation-induced losses. Our framework relies on a power-conservation law for the polarization fields induced in any scatterer. It unifies previous theories on optical scattering bounds and reveals new insight for optimal nanophotonic design, with applications including far-field scattering, near-field local-density-of-states engineering, optimal wavefront shaping, and the design of perfect absorbers. Our bounds predict strikingly large minimal thicknesses for arbitrarily patterned perfect absorbers, ranging from 50--100 nm for typical materials at visible wavelengths to micrometer-scale thicknesses for polar dielectrics at infrared wavelengths. We use inverse design to discover metasurface structures approaching the minimum-thickness perfect-absorber bounds.
Bounds for the best possible designs for optical devices: well-studied [0, 1, 2, 3, 4], yet really hard. More specifically, whenever you give a designer a design spec, it is always worth asking, how good is the best possible design for this spec? And, of course, can the designer…
LolWolfView on HNParent context