<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Annual modulations from secular variations: relaxing DAMA? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.00459/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.00459/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Annual modulations from secular variations: relaxing DAMA? — mentioned by knzhou</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22381309</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2002.00459:22381309</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:25:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s a possibility that a discontinuity in data analysis might have an impact on fundamental physics. Many dark matter detection experiments rely on detecting an annual modulation, i.e. an excess of detection events later in the year, when the Earth would be going into the &amp;#x27;dark matter wind&amp;#x27;. This helps one distinguish the desired signal from backgrounds that don&amp;#x27;t change throughout the year, like cosmic rays or ambient radioactivity. One particular experiment has been claiming a positive detection for two decades, leading to a lot of confusion in the field. It was recently argued [0] that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2002.00459/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item></channel></rss>
