<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A comprehensive catalog of dark matter halo models for SPARC galaxies · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2001.10538/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2001.10538/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A comprehensive catalog of dark matter halo models for SPARC galaxies — mentioned by MattPalmer1086</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39573405</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2001.10538:39573405</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2024 16:03:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The point is that all kinds of dark matter distribution models are proposed and evaluated to see which one fits best. Again, for example: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10538 And they still fail to explain other observations which require additional arguments as to why the dark matter is once again distributed in just the right way to give the rotation curve... that is already successfully predicted by MOND in most cases with just one universal parameter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2001.10538/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
