arXiv:2001.09136cs.CV
No Routing Needed Between Capsules
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Most capsule network designs rely on traditional matrix multiplication between capsule layers and computationally expensive routing mechanisms to deal with the capsule dimensional entanglement that the matrix multiplication introduces. By using Homogeneous Vector Capsules (HVCs), which use element-wise multiplication rather than matrix multiplication, the dimensions of the capsules remain unentangled. In this work, we study HVCs as applied to the highly structured MNIST dataset in order to produce a direct comparison to the capsule research direction of Geoffrey Hinton, et al. In our study, we show that a simple convolutional neural network using HVCs performs as well as the prior best performing capsule network on MNIST using 5.5x fewer parameters, 4x fewer training epochs, no reconstruction sub-network, and requiring no routing mechanism. The addition of multiple classification branches to the network establishes a new state of the art for the MNIST dataset with an accuracy of 99.87% for an ensemble of these models, as well as establishing a new state of the art for a single model (99.83% accurate).
Top papers claim 99.5% accuracy. Since this is measured on a 10,000-sample evaluation set, there are 50 misclassified results. I'd love to see a table of them. Back in the day, papers claiming top performance on MNIST would just start to enumerate all of the misclassified test…
gcrView on HNParent context