HackerPapers

arXiv:1912.13465cs.LG

Reward-Conditioned Policies

Aviral Kumar, Xue Bin Peng, Sergey Levine

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning offers the promise of automating the acquisition of complex behavioral skills. However, compared to commonly used and well-understood supervised learning methods, reinforcement learning algorithms can be brittle, difficult to use and tune, and sensitive to seemingly innocuous implementation decisions. In contrast, imitation learning utilizes standard and well-understood supervised learning methods, but requires near-optimal expert data. Can we learn effective policies via supervised learning without demonstrations? The main idea that we explore in this work is that non-expert trajectories collected from sub-optimal policies can be viewed as optimal supervision, not for maximizing the reward, but for matching the reward of the given trajectory. By then conditioning the policy on the numerical value of the reward, we can obtain a policy that generalizes to larger returns. We show how such an approach can be derived as a principled method for policy search, discuss several variants, and compare the method experimentally to a variety of current reinforcement learning methods on standard benchmarks.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2020 to Oct 2020.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • They mention Rainbow in the related work section of the third paper listed there, Kumar, A., Peng, X. B., & Levine, S. (2019). Reward-Conditioned Policies. arXiv:1912.13465 as part of this remark: "they are also known to be notoriously challenging to use effectively, due to…

      tastroderView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.