<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Using Prolog for Transforming XML Documents · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.10817/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.10817/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Using Prolog for Transforming XML Documents — mentioned by mcswell</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44642243</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1912.10817:44642243</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 01:08:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, I decided I&amp;#x27;d see if there was an XPath library for Prolog (once my favorite programming language, and with some conceptual/ algorithmic similarity to XSLT, I think, although XSLT has nothing like Prolog&amp;#x27;s backtracking). Turns out there is (at least) one: https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?predicate=xpath%2f3. There&amp;#x27;s a comparison of Prolog and XSLT v1 here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.10817v1 (warning: poorly translated from the Russian original, and dated).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.10817/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.PL</category></item></channel></rss>
