HackerPapers

arXiv:1912.10159gr-qc

The Relativistic Geoid: Gravity Potential and Relativistic Effects

Dennis Philipp, Eva Hackmann, Claus Lämmerzahl, Jürgen Müller

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The Earth's geoid is one of the most essential and fundamental concepts to provide a gravity field-related height reference in geodesy and associated sciences. To keep up with the ever-increasing experimental capabilities and to consistently interpret high-precision measurements without any doubt, a relativistic treatment of geodetic notions (including the geoid) within Einstein's theory of General Relativity is inevitable. Building on the theoretical construction of isochronometric surfaces and the so-called redshift potential for clock comparison, we define a relativistic gravity potential as a generalization of (post-)Newtonian notions. This potential exists in any stationary configuration with rigidly co-rotating observers, and it is the same as realized by local plumb lines. In a second step, we employ the gravity potential to define the relativistic geoid in direct analogy to the Newtonian understanding. In the respective limit, the framework allows to recover well-known (post-) Newtonian results. For a better illustration and proper interpretation of the general relativistic gravity potential and geoid, some particular examples are considered. Explicit results are derived for exact vacuum solutions to Einstein's field equation as well as a parametrized post-Newtonian model. Comparing the Earth's Newtonian geoid to its relativistic generalization is a very subtle problem, but of high interest. An isometric embedding into Euclidean three-dimensional space is an appropriate solution and allows a genuinely intrinsic comparison. With this method, the leading-order differences are determined, which are at the mm-level.

arXiv comments
final version, 16 pages, 5 figures, added journal reference
Journal reference
Phys. Rev. D 101, 064032 (2020)
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.064032
Subjects
gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Apr 2024 to Apr 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • tl;dr on this long comment: the article is about a 1960s mistake and how a paper demonstrates an improved model Earth that has non-uniform density can do better than the simplest fix. New Scientist gets an important bit of science wrong, surprise. And some links to even deeper…

      raattgiftView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.