<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Breaking Speech Recognizers to Imagine Lyrics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.06979/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.06979/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Breaking Speech Recognizers to Imagine Lyrics — mentioned by joshuamorton</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25576158</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1912.06979:25576158</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:04:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; As far as I know, those are for experiments that directly interact with humans as part of the experiment itself. Or use certain kinds of data from humans. For example, a machine learning project on medical data (even anonymized medical data) probably needs an IRB approval to gain access to, say, a dataset of cancer imaging. A facial recognition model doesn&amp;#x27;t. What makes those fundamentally different (arguably the facial image is more identifying). &amp;gt; However the incident in question is really about a different kind of thing - it&amp;#x27;s asking researchers to speculate on the future ramifications…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.06979/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.HC</category></item></channel></rss>
