<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairness · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.06883/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.06883/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairness — mentioned by mirker</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28258292</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1912.06883:28258292</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2021 16:33:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, a lot to unpack here. The viewpoint I am presenting is not novel and is what the paper is about. These “academic” notions of fairness are things you can prove for models, unlike ad-hoc variants that “feel” fair. So it’s not “my” viewpoint, but the broader “academic” viewpoint. If you look at section 5.2 of this paper and re-read my post, you will probably better understand what I mean https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.06883.pdf A very similar example is discussed in 6.2 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/1104.3913.pdf, which is a seminal work in the field. Also see Appendix A point 2 for more discussion…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.06883/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
