<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Judge, Jury &amp; Encryptioner: Exceptional Device Access with a Social Cost · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.05620/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.05620/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Judge, Jury &amp; Encryptioner: Exceptional Device Access with a Social Cost — mentioned by cvwright</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22426441</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1912.05620:22426441</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:36:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe something like this? Judge, Jury &amp;amp; Encryptioner: Exceptional Access with a Fixed Social Cost https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.05620 &amp;gt; We present Judge, Jury and Encryptioner (JJE) an exceptional access scheme for unlocking devices that does not give unilateral power to any single authority and places final approval to unlock in the hands of peer devices. Our scheme, JJE, distributes maintenance of the protocol across a network of &amp;quot;custodians&amp;quot; such as courts, government agencies, civil rights watchdogs and academic institutions. Unlock requests, however, can only be approved by a randomly…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.05620/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
