<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspective · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.02757/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.02757/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspective — mentioned by andy99</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43932117</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1912.02757:43932117</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 22:47:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Different initialization converge to different places, e.g https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02757 For LLMs (as with other models), many local optima appear to support roughly the same behavior. This is the idea of the problem being under-specified ie many more equations than unknowns so there are many ways to get the same result.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.02757/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item><item><title>Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspective — mentioned by version_five</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34912540</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1912.02757:34912540</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 16:24:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Related is this one https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02757 which as I understand finds that there&amp;#x27;s little to be gained moving around locally in weight space, vs finding another mode. So it&amp;#x27;s not surprising that a model positioned between two modes would function sort of like an ensemble model&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.02757/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
