<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tidal forces are gravitational waves · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.00591/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.00591/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Tidal forces are gravitational waves — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37120369</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1912.00591:37120369</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 12:40:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no question that this stuff is hard (and has been cutting edge for decades) and that it is easy to make mistakes. &amp;gt; give a more accurate explanation (that makese sense to someone who&amp;#x27;s never taken a GR class) It&amp;#x27;s hard to know what level of understanding to aim for on HN. There are non-relativist working physicists here who somewhat casually read other areas of physics (and mathematics) here, for example, rather than e.g. physics SE or looking through literature reviews. I&amp;#x27;m guessing that you have done GR but probably not much with approximations like GEM, nor looked into the history…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1912.00591/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
