arXiv:1911.09983cs.LG
TreeGen: A Tree-Based Transformer Architecture for Code Generation
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
A code generation system generates programming language code based on an input natural language description. State-of-the-art approaches rely on neural networks for code generation. However, these code generators suffer from two problems. One is the long dependency problem, where a code element often depends on another far-away code element. A variable reference, for example, depends on its definition, which may appear quite a few lines before. The other problem is structure modeling, as programs contain rich structural information. In this paper, we propose a novel tree-based neural architecture, TreeGen, for code generation. TreeGen uses the attention mechanism of Transformers to alleviate the long-dependency problem, and introduces a novel AST reader (encoder) to incorporate grammar rules and AST structures into the network. We evaluated TreeGen on a Python benchmark, HearthStone, and two semantic parsing benchmarks, ATIS and GEO. TreeGen outperformed the previous state-of-the-art approach by 4.5 percentage points on HearthStone, and achieved the best accuracy among neural network-based approaches on ATIS (89.1%) and GEO (89.6%). We also conducted an ablation test to better understand each component of our model.
Yup, saw a few papers about this over the past two years, using graph neural networks for code generation. There's also another thread below on this topic. Edit: Here's some of the papers: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09983 and https://aclanthology.org/2021.findings-acl.384.pdf
kevinlu1248View on HNParent context
Here's some of the papers: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09983 and https://aclanthology.org/2021.findings-acl.384.pdf
kevinlu1248View on HNParent context