https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.09432/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21990054urn:hackerpapers:submission:1911.09432:21990054Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:11:46 GMT<p>A Cryptoeconomic Traffic Analysis of Bitcoin’s Lightning Network</p><p></p><p>2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.09432/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CRhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21612121urn:hackerpapers:mention:1911.09432:21612121Sat, 23 Nov 2019 02:55:38 GMT<p>From the paper [1] &gt; A core value proposition of LN is that Bitcoin users can execute payments with negligible transaction fees. This feature may be cherished by payment initiators, but in case of insufficiently low network traffic, it could be unprofitable for router entities. Relative to the purposely (and ingeniously) wasteful process of mining, LN will always be faster and cheaper. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.09432.pdf (PDF)</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.09432/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CRhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21612031urn:hackerpapers:submission:1911.09432:21612031Sat, 23 Nov 2019 02:28:34 GMT<p>A Cryptoeconomic Traffic Analysis of Bitcoin’s Lightning Network</p><p></p><p>3 points; 2 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.09432/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CR