<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Failure of Normalization in Impredicative Type Theory with Proof-Irrelevant Propositional Equality · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.08174/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.08174/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Failure of Normalization in Impredicative Type Theory with Proof-Irrelevant Propositional Equality — mentioned by omegafixedpoint</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436170</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1911.08174:48436170</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 16:08:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A few notes, because this is obviously vibe coded, and does not work in many ways. 1. Yon&amp;#x27;s documentation mentions &amp;quot;Homotopy type theory:&amp;quot; &amp;gt; the runnable HoTT fragment is refl/pair/fst/snd These are basic features of martin-lof type theory, not homotopy type theory. The documentation makes no reference of an interval type, which is generally the way to go for decidable type-checking in HoTT without univalence as an opaque axiom. Pi types are mentioned, but Yon does not have dependent types. From what I can tell, they are polymorphic, maybe even just simply-typed (except for identity types…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.08174/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LO</category></item><item><title>Failure of Normalization in Impredicative Type Theory with Proof-Irrelevant Propositional Equality — mentioned by foooobar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27564061</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1911.08174:27564061</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2021 20:18:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Some constructivists may also take offense with proof irrelevance (and the resulting loss of normalization [1] or its incompatibility with HoTT), which you can only really avoid by avoiding Prop. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08174&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.08174/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LO</category></item><item><title>Failure of Normalization in Impredicative Type Theory with Proof-Irrelevant Propositional Equality — mentioned by SkySkimmer</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22174823</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1911.08174:22174823</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:31:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The normalization issue is not about quotients at all. It&amp;#x27;s https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08174 &amp;quot;Failure of Normalization in Impredicative Type Theory with Proof-Irrelevant Propositional Equality&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.08174/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
