<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>What is the gradient of a scalar function of a symmetric matrix ? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.06491/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.06491/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>What is the gradient of a scalar function of a symmetric matrix ? — mentioned by wnoise</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29911027</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1911.06491:29911027</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:36:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; For example, the gradient of some function wrt to elements of a symmetric matrix is and should be different depending on whether the matrix is structurally symmetric Ugh. Yes and no, but mostly no. A gradient is a collection of partial derivatives. The normal meaning of partial derivative with respect to symmetric matrix elements does not actually exist, because you can&amp;#x27;t vary them independently. This is actually a generic problem for any overparameterized constrained system. People still want to be able to use the standard tools of calculus though. You can reasonably do things like use…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.06491/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NA</category></item></channel></rss>
