<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The TV is Smart and Full of Trackers: Towards Understanding the Smart TV Advertising and Tracking Ecosystem · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.03447/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.03447/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The TV is Smart and Full of Trackers: Towards Understanding the Smart TV Advertising and Tracking Ecosystem — mentioned by rolandog</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42389039</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1911.03447:42389039</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:57:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the delay in my response. To answer your question directly: I&amp;#x27;m pointing out unexpected privacy pitfalls of using a smart TV&amp;#x27;s full set of features (i.e. running apps and using it ... as a monitor). Although I agree with the point of your solution... I disagree with minimizing the danger of such anti-features. To elaborate, try thinking of your average reasonable person and think of their journey into learning how to preserve their privacy without losing access to the features of the services and products they have paid for. Without a massive effort it is ultimately an oxymoron. A…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1911.03447/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NI</category></item></channel></rss>
