<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the Stability of Self-similar Blow-up for $C^{1,α}$ Solutions to the Incompressible Euler Equations on $\mathbb{R}^3$ · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.14071/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.14071/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the Stability of Self-similar Blow-up for $C^{1,α}$ Solutions to the Incompressible Euler Equations on $\mathbb{R}^3$ — mentioned by fluffything</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21834184</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1910.14071:21834184</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:12:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; They should be able to describe the motion of any fluid under any circumstances — and for more than two centuries, they have. The Euler equations neglect viscosity. &amp;gt; They also assume that fluids are “incompressible,” meaning that under the rules of the Euler equations, you can’t squeeze a fluid into a smaller space than the one it already occupies. The Euler equations are compressible flow equations. --- These two mistakes could have been corrected had the author read the first sentence of the wikipedia page about the Euler equations. The TL;DR is that there are two papers that show that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.14071/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.AP</category></item></channel></rss>
