<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Revisiting LTE LAA: Channel Access, QoS, and Coexistence with WiFi · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.11002/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.11002/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Revisiting LTE LAA: Channel Access, QoS, and Coexistence with WiFi — mentioned by stefan_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35711914</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1910.11002:35711914</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 11:09:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper is a good summary: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.11002.pdf And of course all other unlicensed band users do this. Again, this is a regulatory requirement. And ultimately, it is not just that you need to ensure others have access to the band, you also need to be robust in the face of persistent high interference given the number of users in the unlicensed bands. It&amp;#x27;s not a good fit for default LTE.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.11002/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NI</category></item></channel></rss>
