HackerPapers

arXiv:1910.04858cs.CV

Training-Free Uncertainty Estimation for Dense Regression: Sensitivity as a Surrogate

Lu Mi, Hao Wang, Yonglong Tian, Hao He, Nir Shavit

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Uncertainty estimation is an essential step in the evaluation of the robustness for deep learning models in computer vision, especially when applied in risk-sensitive areas. However, most state-of-the-art deep learning models either fail to obtain uncertainty estimation or need significant modification (e.g., formulating a proper Bayesian treatment) to obtain it. Most previous methods are not able to take an arbitrary model off the shelf and generate uncertainty estimation without retraining or redesigning it. To address this gap, we perform a systematic exploration into training-free uncertainty estimation for dense regression, an unrecognized yet important problem, and provide a theoretical construction justifying such estimations. We propose three simple and scalable methods to analyze the variance of outputs from a trained network under tolerable perturbations: infer-transformation, infer-noise, and infer-dropout. They operate solely during the inference, without the need to re-train, re-design, or fine-tune the models, as typically required by state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation methods. Surprisingly, even without involving such perturbations in training, our methods produce comparable or even better uncertainty estimation when compared to training-required state-of-the-art methods.

arXiv comments
In proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2020 to May 2020.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Yes, definitely. Though there has been some interesting papers recently on this using different methods to approximate bayesian posteriors in NN's. One of the most recent ones (Mi et al., 2019; https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04858) that benchmarks a few different methods…

      amcoastalView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.