<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Resolution of Keller's Conjecture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.03740/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.03740/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Resolution of Keller's Conjecture — mentioned by Someone</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24293240</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1910.03740:24293240</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:03:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper is at https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.03740. Skimming it the answer appears to be “because they had that cluster”. They say they only used 20 machines (each with 24 CPUs, so I guess these are fairly beefy) Given the 224 GB (binary) size of the proof memory usage might be a problem, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.03740/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item><item><title>The Resolution of Keller's Conjecture — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24290620</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1910.03740:24290620</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 06:16:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The Resolution of Keller&amp;#x27;s Conjecture&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.03740/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
