<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum principle of relativity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.02780/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.02780/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum principle of relativity — mentioned by ajuc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29978202</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1910.02780:29978202</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:45:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;At least when you think of objects moving slower than light there can&amp;#x27;t be reversing of casuality. But relativity allows for that, we just drop the faster than light solutions usually as non-physical. Recently there&amp;#x27;s been an interesting paper about what happens when we don&amp;#x27;t drop these solutions: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.02780 Imagine the Andromeda fleet can move faster than light. When you look at it from Earth POV suddenly it manifests near Earth out of nothing. Looks very similar to quantum mechanics indeterminism - if alien general decided to send the fleet it&amp;#x27;s there, if he didn&amp;#x27;t…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.02780/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Quantum principle of relativity — mentioned by ajuc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29156006</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1910.02780:29156006</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:02:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently an interesting paper came out that starts by accepting all solutions to special relativity (usually the faster-than-light solutions are ignored) and goes on to derive the axioms of quantum mechanics from just that. It turns out what you need to prevent timetravel paradoxes is exactly quantum mechanics. https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/540753 https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.02780 I don&amp;#x27;t understand the whole derivation (especially the way they move from 1+1 to 3+1 spacetime), but it feels quite elegant. It could be interpreted as universe having a separate family of particles going…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1910.02780/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
