HackerPapers

arXiv:1909.13639cs.DC

NeuroVectorizer: End-to-End Vectorization with Deep Reinforcement Learning

Ameer Haj-Ali, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Ted Willke, Sophia Shao, Krste Asanovic, Ion Stoica

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

One of the key challenges arising when compilers vectorize loops for today's SIMD-compatible architectures is to decide if vectorization or interleaving is beneficial. Then, the compiler has to determine how many instructions to pack together and how many loop iterations to interleave. Compilers are designed today to use fixed-cost models that are based on heuristics to make vectorization decisions on loops. However, these models are unable to capture the data dependency, the computation graph, or the organization of instructions. Alternatively, software engineers often hand-write the vectorization factors of every loop. This, however, places a huge burden on them, since it requires prior experience and significantly increases the development time. In this work, we explore a novel approach for handling loop vectorization and propose an end-to-end solution using deep reinforcement learning (RL). We conjecture that deep RL can capture different instructions, dependencies, and data structures to enable learning a sophisticated model that can better predict the actual performance cost and determine the optimal vectorization factors. We develop an end-to-end framework, from code to vectorization, that integrates deep RL in the LLVM compiler. Our proposed framework takes benchmark codes as input and extracts the loop codes. These loop codes are then fed to a loop embedding generator that learns an embedding for these loops. Finally, the learned embeddings are used as input to a Deep RL agent, which determines the vectorization factors for all the loops. We further extend our framework to support multiple supervised learning methods. We evaluate our approaches against the currently used LLVM vectorizer and loop polyhedral optimization techniques. Our experiments show 1.29X-4.73X performance speedup compared to baseline and only 3% worse than the brute-force search on a wide range of benchmarks.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.DCDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing cs.PFPerformance cs.PLProgramming Languages

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Dec 2019 to Dec 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.