<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Box Covers and Domain Orderings for Beyond Worst-Case Join Processing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1909.12102/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1909.12102/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Box Covers and Domain Orderings for Beyond Worst-Case Join Processing — mentioned by namibj</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45026494</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1909.12102:45026494</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 13:46:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Or, instead of &amp;quot;estimate the distribution&amp;quot; look at what conceptual properties of the instance the big-O cares about. And then derive big-O in terms of such properties. See for example Tetris-LoadBalanced and Tetris-Reordered (on top of Tetris-LoadBalanced) for such works: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12102&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1909.12102/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DB</category></item></channel></rss>
